A few words about the later first: It’s a fantastic little camera. It’s easily my new everyday carry camera with the 20mm lens on it. This is the closest thing to an heir apparent to my M6 which has been gathering dust for the last year and half. Actually, writing about how long it’s been since I’ve shot film could be another post entirely.

Where was I?

Right. Fantastic camera. My current workflow is Aperture. And that’s where digital rangefinder nirvana begins to crumble. The GF1 isn’t supported by Aperture. Apple seems to have let Aperture fall by the wayside in the grand scheme of RAW support. That’s  a bummer. Shoot JPEG you say? If you have a camera that shots RAW there’s only a handful os situations that makes shoot JPEG. I shoot RAW almost exclusively. Enter the Lightroom 3 Beta. I thought I’d have a good jump on the learning curve with my experience in Adobe’s Creative Suite.

Not so much.

I think some of it is that Aperture had really shaped my view of what to expect out of a photo management application. Apple consistently nails user interface. Aperture is no exception—it really is, at least in my opinion and experience, the better photo management application. This isn’t a shortcoming on Adobe’s part. It was a conscious decision by Adobe to publish a photo manipulation package for photographers. Comparing them becomes an exercise in apples and broccoli because of this fundamental difference.

But where Adobe appears to be pulling ahead is that they keep rolling out support for new cameras. I have a hard time imaging a technology that’s moving faster than digital photography right now. Keeping up with it all is a big deal. If Apple wants to continue touting Aperture as a solution for professional photographers they need to pick up the pace. Personally, I don’t need a lightroom. I want to get the shot as close to perfect in camera. Maybe bump the contrast. Maybe push the saturation a tick. That’s usually it. But I need RAW support.

I’ll eventually adapt to Lightroom’s workflow. It obviously works for thousands of people. And for now, I’m not planning on shooting hired work with the GF1. Not yet. So in that regard there’s some separation between church and state—rather personal and work. Maybe that’s a good thing.

These shots are some of the first I’ve taken with the GF1 taken over New Year’s Eve up in the North Carolina mountains.

I snapped these two shots with the iPhone on the ferry and had posted them to my Flickr account, Twitter and Facebook before we set foot on St. Thomas. (There’s still some issues with the WordPress iPhone app that need to be worked out a bit.)

I’ve gotten some questions about how I’ve processed some of these. So here’s the scoop:

A few weeks ago, I apparently drank some of the Chase Jarvis Kool-Aid. The flavor being the Best Camera concept. The Reader’s Digest version of that concept is that the best camera is the one that you have with you. For Jarvis that came to be the iPhone’s built-in camera.

If I don’t have my Canon 5DMk2 with me, I have the G9. In fact, around town it’s almost always in my bag. It’s easily the best point and shoot I’ve had. Don’t get me wrong, it still has some weak points. Chiefly the shutter lag. If it had a shutter response that was more akin to the 5D or any of my old film cameras I’d have no complaints with the camera.

Still, there’s a few times, when the G9 is just out of reach or it’s still in the bag in the office. But, I’m never without my iPhone. And the camera is decent if not spectacular. I think it has the same issues that most small sensor digital cameras have and that’s chiefly contrast. But for a 2MB camera phone it works. (Especially if you remember that “shutter” doesn’t release until you remove your finger from the “button.”) Being part of my “always with me” iPhone certainly has it qualify as the Best Camera on more than one occasion.

This is where software enters the picture. Like I said, the iPhone camera has it’s issues and can use a little help. I think software like Best Camera and Adobe’s Photoshop.com is much like the Lomography folks shooting with Lomos, Dianas and  Holgas. For the record: There’s a taped up Holga gathering dusk in the equipment locker behind me.

Where was I? Right. The same way those analog equivalents embraced the inexpensively, plastic-lensed cameras and the random color shifts, light leaks and whatever else happened through processing, I see the tweaking of the soft, flat images off the iPhone as a related idea. And there’s a certain irony to using all this technology to render images that remind me of family pictures taken with a 110mm camera.

The difference being that it’s much quicker to get these images out—to share them. Before, with film, you had to make an effort. You had to really work to get an image out. Film or slides needed to be processed, then printed—or scanned. Then you could get to sharing them. The process itself encouraged editing. Required it.

With digital? It’s on the photographer to really think about the editing process. Instead of simply uploading the contents of a card.

Shot this with iPhone and tweaked it with Ps.com’s mobile app. I’ve definitely started drinking the Chase Jarvis Kool-Aid. Of course, I took some with the G9 too but without a laptop this is the only way to post for this trip.